Talk:The Box/@comment-36181733-20180728020012/@comment-97.80.10.242-20180829153546

The Antibox and the Otherbox are part of the box. To explain: if the box could be defined as a numberset between (∞ through -∞), then the opposite of that would still be the exact same numberset of (-∞ through ∞); therefore, the box contains the entire anti-box and vise versa. The other-box is based on the idea that there is a dimention where the other-box is infinately displaced from the box and therefore not a part of it. In this dimention, think of the box being like (∞ through -∞) + ∞ and the other box as (∞ through -∞) - ∞. The arguement here is that when such displaced that the box would become (∞ through 0) and the other box (0 through -∞), but this idea come from a failure to understand how classical algerbra does not work with infinate numbersets. ∞ - ∞ does not equal zero, it equals another infinate numberset of (∞ through -∞); so, infinately displacing the box results in (∞ through (∞ through -∞)) which equals (∞ through -∞). Therefore, the other box, just like the anti-box, is contained inside the box.